Trump ‘not happy’ with deal, weighing options for building wall

National/World News
This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump voiced displeasure Tuesday at a border security deal struck by congressional negotiators, hinting it might not meet his requirements for constructing a wall.

“Am I happy? The answer is no, I’m not. I’m not happy,” Trump said when questioned about the agreement during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House.

He said he was still studying the details of the agreement.

But he stopped short of saying he would reject the accord, which Democrats and Republicans announced late Monday.

Instead, he suggested he had other mechanisms ready to deploy to satisfy his need for border wall funding.

“I’m adding things to it,” Trump said. “It’s all going to happen, where we’re going to build a beautiful, big, strong wall.”

A White House official said the president is likely to sign the deal, but aides caution that nothing is final.

Trump also said Tuesday a government shutdown is unlikely at the end of the week, even if a funding agreement isn’t fully satisfactory.

“I don’t think you’re going to see a shutdown,” Trump said. “If you did have it, it’s the Democrats’ fault.”

The president must soon decide whether he can accept the border security deal struck by congressional negotiators that falls far short of his original demands.

The agreement, which includes $1,375,000,000 for a border barrier, falls well short of the $5.7 billion he originally demanded for a wall. It even falls short of the $1.6 billion included in a Senate package last year.

Still, the measure would avert another government shutdown, which polls showed Trump took the blame for last time around.

The White House says Trump is continuing to weigh his options — which still include taking executive action to secure funding for a wall.

“We’re not going to get into a conversation of what could be in this document. We want to focus on what’s actually in the document. Until we see that it’s going to be very difficult to have a conversation about what we will and won’t accept,” spokesman Hogan Gidley told reporters at the White House on Tuesday.

White House officials have a roster of options they have been weighing that would employ the president’s executive authority to secure money for a border wall.

Not all would require declaring a national emergency. The president is being urged by conservatives to take executive action in conjunction with signing the compromise legislation that would avert a government shutdown.

It’s not clear which combination of actions the president might use, and the topic has been under debate for weeks.

The estimates for how much each option could garner have also been under debate. The president has held nearly daily meetings with senior advisers and others to discuss his options.

Drafts of the executive orders or declarations have been circulating for weeks inside the West Wing. All have been heavily examined by the counsel’s office and the Justice Department, and most White House aides believe any executive action will prompt legal challenges.

The various options have come with differing legal outlooks, according to people familiar with the matter. There are also concerns about landowners bringing legal challenges should their land be seized for border construction using eminent domain.

Moving money from disaster relief funds is also seen as politically problematic by some senior aides.

The White House is prepared to roll out executive actions piece by piece, not necessarily all at once, once the president signs off.

In reality, it won’t be as easy as just signing one piece of paper and being done with it.

That’s what acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and other agency heads have been up to over the past weeks: Finding pools of money they can use to fund a border wall.

Some of those will be easy and some will be more difficult legally, aides familiar with the matter said.

Even as lawmakers haggled over details of their agreement, the White House had been planning behind the scenes to secure the funds unilaterally.

That is partly why administration aides weren’t fazed over the weekend when reports emerged the talks had broken down.

Trademark and Copyright 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Most Read

Top Stories

More Home Page Top Stories