Detective won’t face charges on accusations he hid evidence in young mom’s death

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Data pix.

EVANS, Colo. -- Prosecutors in Weld County told Ashley Fallis’ family Wednesday that they did not believe they could win a criminal prosecution against an Evans police detective who investigated Ashley’s 2012 death.

“I’m disappointed but I’m not surprised,” said Ashley’s mother Jenna Fox.

Fox said in the hour-long meeting, prosecutors said they could reveal little since the criminal investigation against Ashley’s husband Tom Fallis is still underway. Fox said prosecutors have turned the case against Detective Michael Yates back over to Evans police for internal proceedings.

In April, as a result of a Fox 31 Denver investigation, Ashley Fallis’ death investigation was reopened. Fox 31 Denver uncovered police reports containing material omissions in Detective Michael Yates’ reports. The omissions were statements allegedly made by Tom Fallis the night of his wife’s death.

“I heard him say 'I shot her,'” said neighbor Nick Glover.  He says he told those statements to Detective Yates, but Yates’ reports did not contain them.

On Wednesday, prosecutors declined to charge Yates criminally for omitting the statements.

Chief Rick Brandt issued a statement Thursday stating that he will now request an internal affairs investigation to determine if Yates violated department policies.

A criminal case is very hard to prove against an officer,” said Fox’s attorney Dan Recht.  “This does not mean that he won’t be suspended or fired as a result of an internal investigation,” which Recht says he expects.

The Fallis family remains focused on the criminal investigation. They are also planning a fundraiser. Those interested in details can check the Ashley Fallis Memorial Foundation Facebook page.





  • Fast45

    Why does this station safeguard our Gang-in-Blue by removing comments from folks here who have great reasons to distrust them? Answer: Because KDVR creates news … instead of reporting facts. Dissent apparently is not tolerated.

  • Anonymous

    So KDVR.. Seems you are totally against dissenting views and not post them.. Gee what a surprise.. NOT

  • Anonymous

    If it had been anyone else they would have had enough to go after him..Why is it they seem to always have enough evidence against reg citizens but never have enough to go after CRIMINAL COPS? Answer that 1 KDVR

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.