Red-light camera ban gets green light from committee

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

DENVER -- A group of Colorado police chiefs and a number of people in wheelchairs couldn't stop a bipartisan proposal to ban red light cameras across the state, which lawmakers voted out of committee Monday afternoon.

"We should be about safety, we shouldn't be about revenue," said the bill's sponsor, Sen. Scott Renfroe, R-Greeley. "These cameras are about revenue."

Renfroe, who is running for Congress, has sponsored the proposal twice before, but only now does the bill have solid bipartisan support, with Democrats who favor the legislation touching on privacy concerns.

"Red light and speeding cameras diminish the civil liberties of Coloradans," said Sen. Lucia Guzman, D-Denver, who is co-sponsoring Renfroe's bill. "We all have a constitutional right to address an accuser, even if the accusation is a traffic violation."

While the bill seems broadly popular with the public, law enforcement and the Colorado Municipal League strongly oppose the state stepping in and telling cities they can no longer use red light camera technology, which they argue has reduced traffic accidents.

"Again and again when I'm out talking to people, I'm told that people have changed their behavior because of the presence of these cameras," Aurora Police Chief Daniel Oates told the Senate Transportation Committee.

Chief Michelle Tovrea of Cherry Hills Village told FOX31 Denver that her community hasn't seen a fatal traffic accident at the intersection of University and Belleview since installing its only red light camera there.

"Traffic accidents have gone down," she said.

Renfroe, who dismissed much of the research showing a public safety impact that's been underwritten by red light camera companies or the cities the use them, said that lengthening yellow lights would improve public safety without denying drivers their due process.

"Red light cameras take a picture, but they don't tell a story," he said. "People have a story and they should have a right to confront their accuser, that due process that's constitutionally given to our citizens. You don't have that with a red light camera ticket."

In Aurora, for example, just three percent of drivers who get tickets from red light cameras contest their tickets; of those, 23 percent are dismissed, Oates testified.

Julie Farrar, one of three handicapped people who showed up in wheelchairs to testify Monday, argued that the cameras help protect pedestrians and should be kept.

"Please remember we are talking about people: cyclists, people in wheelchairs, children, people with visual impairments, seniors, versus people in cars that weigh several thousand pounds getting caught on camera breaking the law," she said.

If the proposal becomes law, Colorado would be the 10th state in the country to ban red light cameras.



  • Ann Pirie

    I cannot believe that deterring accidents the cameras should not be kept. Everyone needs to be aware they are on camera if that is what it takes to keep us safe. Money, be damned. So, the two-fold of it is good.

      • colocaver

        Government over reach and red light cameras/cameras of all sorts really do go together, cobobbles, and this is what the whole story above is about so truly you are unable to conflate the basic concept here.

  • Jeff Baker

    I don’t know how many times I’ve sat at Mississippi and Alameda watched the cameras flash when no one was moving, and at the same intersection I’ve seen cars go blasting through and the cameras didn’t flash. At night with precipitation falling the flash is only compounded, talk about distracted driving.

  • Codswallop Hogwash

    This may produce revenue, but justifiably so.
    It does discourage idiots from running red lights, and if they enforced it across the board, would save a lot of lives.
    Our stupid politicians are playing to the idiots, with whom they have much in common.

  • Ward Schwartzmiller

    I think it is a big mistake to take down the red light cameras. The people that want them taken down just don’t to pay a fine for getting caught. The intersections that have them I hardly ever see cars running the lights, but a lot of intersections that don’t have cameras people run red lights all the time. I’m supprised we don’t see more accidents at these intersections. I have yet to see a rearender due to someone stopping at a red light camera monitored intersection. The cameras save lives and thats what matters here.

  • Ward Schwartzmiller

    I was broadsided by a car running a red light. The lady that hit me came over to my car and asked if I was alright. I mumbled I think so. She then returned to her car and drove away. If there had been a camera at that intersection she might have been caught but as it turned out she was never found. I lost my car due to her. Thank goodness not my life, but it could have been much different. I’m sure cameras can only help.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.