Study: Amendment 66 means $4 billion economic gain for Colorado

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

DENVER — The Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado, Boulder released two economic studies of Amendment 66, a statewide income tax hike on the ballot this November that aims to raise an annual $950 million in education funding to improve Colorado schools.

One study shows that Colorado’s economy would lose $224 million in economic activity during the first five years of the higher income tax rate.

“All scenarios in isolation, not accounting for how the additional revenue is spent, have a drag on the Colorado economy,” write Richard Wobbekind and Brian Lewandowski, the study’s authors.

But a second study done by the Leeds School found that Amendment 66, if approved by voters, will yield at least $4 billion in annual economic gains to the start once gains from reduced drop-out rates and increased high school and college graduation were factored in.

Supporters of Amendment 66 pointed to a different study by Jack Strauss, a professor of applied economics at the Daniels College of Business at the University of Denver, that estimated an even greater economic impact.

He calculated the economic gains to Colorado to be $3.3 billion annually. In total, the benefits of Amendment 66 are predicted to exceed the $950 price tag for taxpayers by about $3.6 billion. That’s based on Strauss’s model, which includes benefits from reduced crime, healthcare savings, lower unemployment and welfare costs, increased property values and increased business retention and attraction.

“Colorado gains when its children perform better in school, and investing in our schools today will improve Colorado’s future,” Strauss concludes.

Colorado Commits to Kids, the organization backing Amendment 66, urges the public to consider the two studies side by side.

“These reports reach the conclusion many Colorado voters understand intuitively – investing in our education system is good for our students and it’s good for Colorado,” said Andrew Freedman, Campaign Director for Amendment 66.

“To review the impacts of increased taxes without taking into account the benefits of an improved education system is only looking at half of the equation.”

Senate Republicans issued a press release Wednesday night focusing on the impact of the taxes.

“This study reinforces the concerns that business owners across our state have had since this measure was first introduced,” said Sen. Scott Renfroe, R-Greeley. “The idea that private sector jobs will be lost and more government jobs created is concerning and quite frankly one of the worst possible things that could happen to Colorado’s economy.”



  • Ray Greco

    ANYONE can fund a study. In doing so, you automatically place bias on the outcome of the study. Most of the factors cited as socio-economic benefits cannot be predicted or controlled. This article is totally biased and misleading. Spending on education has increased in a steady fashion since the 1970s with little to no measurable improvement in ‘standardized’ test scores. Unions have been enriched, massive waste incurred, studies conducted and blame placed. All kids do not learn in a ‘standard’ way. All kids do not have the same genetic predisposition to crave knowledge. All kids do not have the same home environment. Yet, we test all kids in the same way, expecting the same outcome. Our education system is an abysmal failure. Let’s dump more money into it??? Thanks but no thanks.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.