EPA hearing on climate plan will draw big crowd in Denver

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

The Twentymile coal mine is about 15 miles southeast of Steamboat Springs.

DENVER — The only one of four scheduled public hearings on the EPA’s plan to reduce carbon emissions taking place west of Pittsburgh is set for Lower Downtown Tuesday morning — and it’s likely to draw a huge crowd of activists on all sides.

More than 1,600 people are scheduled to speak on the record at the four hearings taking place across the country — Atlanta and Washington, DC are the other two locations — about the Obama administration’s plan to cut greenhouse gas-producing emissions by 30 percent by the year 2030, mostly by reducing emissions from coal power plants.

Analysts say the plan, which is very similar to a plan already being implemented in Colorado, could cut coal use by almost half, while boosting power generated from natural gas, nuclear plants and renewable energy. Environmental advocates say such a shift is long overdue. Many business lobbyists say the change could cause electricity prices to rise and damage fledgling industries.

More than 300,000 comments have already been submitted online and myriad local organizations are planning events outside the EPA headquarters at 16th and Wynkoop Tuesday morning.

A group of clean-tech businesses and employees plans to “highlight the benefits” of cleaner energy at a rally at 8:15 outside the EPA building.

Another group, “Colorado Moms Know Best, Moms Clean Air Force” will hold another news conference at 12:15 p.m. in support of the EPA’s proposal at the Millennium Bridge next to Commons Park.

And the national League of Conservation Voters is running ads on Denver’s airwaves in support of the rules, panning the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for its opposition to them.

GOP gubernatorial hopeful Bob Beauprez will join a number of Western Slope lawmakers and officials at a noon press conference near the Capitol that’s being organized by Americans For Prosperity, a free-market group funded largely by the billionaire Koch brothers.

“The EPA has chosen ideology over common sense policies and in the process is threatening to destroy tens of thousands of jobs and drive up the cost of energy,” said Dustin Zvonek, Colorado State Director of Americans for Prosperity. “Our activists are looking forward to making it clear that they expect Congress to rein in the EPA, stop these regulations from being implemented, and stand up for sensible energy policy that creates jobs and keeps energy prices low.”

Gardner hits Udall over support for air rules

On Monday, GOP U.S. Senate candidate Cory Gardner drilled Democratic Sen. Mark Udall for supporting the EPA’s proposal.

Udall was one of the first vulnerable Democratic incumbents to come out publicly in support for the rules when they were announced about two months ago.

At the time, Gardner didn’t have much to say and declined to comment in a FOX31 story about Udall’s statement of support.

Now Gardner is criticizing Udall for “sid[ing] with the EPA over Colorado”.

“We have a duty to protect our environment, but it can be done responsibly and at the state level,” Gardner said in a statement from his campaign. “Senator Udall should reconsider his decision to privilege unelected federal bureaucrats over the people of Colorado.”

5 comments

  • Tsar Alexander

    The Envirofascists will strike again.
    Weather has changed from hot to cold, wet to dry for tens of thousands of years.
    THERE IS STILL NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT CARBON DIOXIDE IS A PROBLEM. IN FACT, THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE, AND IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED – THAT CD INCREASES CROP SIZES PROVIDING MORE FOOD FOR A HUNGRY WORLD.

  • Anonymous

    @Tsar Alexander. If you believe that, will you bet your life and the life of your family on your beliefs?

    There is nothing wrong with believing that we as humans can do more for mother earth and our species. As many scientists have shown (no, I am not here to do the research for you), reducing “bad” environmental emissions will help the earth and most animal life, including humans. There is nothing wrong with striving to make energy production cleaner and more sustainable. Anyone who touts the use of coal and petroleum (a finite resource) over renewable energy, should really re-examine their beliefs on this matter. As we all know, the betterment of human kind and the earth, is not the in the best interests of people who cannot view the world from the other side or who cannot change their minds once the evidence points to the obvious. Belief without scientific backing “is” a religion.

    May all your lives and your family learn to appreciate life with an open mind.

Comments are closed.