Watch live: ‘Daybreak’
Watch live: ‘Good Day Colorado’
🌀 Track Hurricane Maria: Interactive Map

Judge decides to give Michael Blagg new trial after juror lied

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. — Michael Blagg, who was sent to prison in 2004 for murdering his wife, will get a new trial because one member of the jury who convicted him lied on a questionnaire, a judge has ruled.

Blagg, 51, has been in prison on a life sentence for the November 2001 murder of his wife Jennifer. During his trial, prosecutors presented evidence that he shot Jennifer in the face while she was sleeping. He then placed her body in a dumpster, prosecutors said.

Investigators later found Jennifer’s body in the Mesa County landfill.

The couple’s daughter, Abby, 6, disappeared at the same time as her mother. Abby’s body has never been found and Blagg was not charged in her disappearance.

Blagg’s trial lasted 23 days and gained national attention. Much of the trail focused on the issue of domestic violence between Blagg and his wife.

Blagg did not confess to the crime. There were no eyewitnesses and no physical evidence linking him to his wife’s death.

One of the questions asked of the jurors before the trail was if any of them had been the victim of domestic violence.

Juror Marilyn Charlesworth replied no to the question. However, several years later, when Charlesworth appeared before the Grand Junction City Council on behalf of domestic violence victims, she admitted she had been victimized for 10 years.

Mesa County district Judge David Bottger took the rare step of ordering a new trial for Blagg, citing the juror’s dishonest answer, reported KREX-TV.

Bottger said he did not know if the outcome of the trail would have been different if Charlesworth had not been on the jury. However, Blagg deserves a fair trial by a jury of 12, he said.

Mesa County Assistant District Attorney Rich Tuttle said his office has not decided if they will appeal the retrial ruling.

Tuttle also said they have not yet decided to prosecute Charlesworth for her misrepresentation under oath.

A retrial will likely be expensive and time consuming, Tuttle said.


  • Anonymous

    Seriously, KDVR/Thomas Hendrick… spelling the word “trial” wrong three times in one story is ridiculous and so unprofessional.

  • Bev

    1) what 10 yrs of her life was she a victim?
    2) was it before or after the case?
    As for its now been 10 years if I did my numbers right? I might be off by a few months.
    3) At the time she answered no did she even realize that she was a victim?

  • Nut Busters

    Just a case of a defense lawyer, who will now rack up 10’s of thousands of dollars in billing.. All to be paid by the taxpayers.. And Blagg agrees to it so he can get regular field trips out of jail..

  • Mister Rogers

    While this individual might be guilty I have some concerns. 1.) Either the reporting it catsup and this story was thrown together or; 2.) This case should have never gone to court in the first place. No physical evidence, no confession, and no witnesses. I’m sorry but how does a defense attorney lose a case like that.

Comments are closed.