Watch live: ‘Daybreak’
Watch live: ‘Good Day Colorado’

Second gay marriage case gets hearing at appeals court in Denver

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(Photo: MGN Online)

DENVER — A second hearing on the constitutionality of gay marriage was heard before a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on Thursday.

The case involves two Oklahoma women who sued after a county clerk refused to give them a marriage license. In January, a lower court struck down Oklahoma’s gay marriage ban, though the judge stayed his ruling, preventing same-sex marriages from taking place until the case was appealed.

The same three judges hearing the Oklahoma case heard a similar case out of Utah last week. A lower court struck down Utah’s ban on gay marriage, but the judge there allowed there, and more than 1,000 gay couples wed before the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay.

“Essentially, (the cases) are not that different,” Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Byron Babione, who is representing Tulsa County Clerk Sally Howe Smith, told The Associated Press. “Both of them involve challenges to state marriage amendments that were passed by an overwhelming majority of the people.”

No matter how the 10th Circuit rules, the Utah and Oklahoma cases are expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Appeals courts in coming weeks and months will hear similar challenges over current bans in Virginia, Nevada, Texas, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan.

A near unbroken string of state and federal court victories nationwide in the past year gives marriage equality supporters unbridled encouragement their ultimate goal will be achieved: eliminating all laws limiting the rights of gays and lesbians to wed.

U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby struck down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage five days before Christmas, saying the state’s “current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason. Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional.”

The ruling drew national attention partly because Utah is viewed as among the more conservative states, and because the justices ruled this past summer on separate issues involving same-sex marriage.

In June, the nation’s highest court cleared the way for same-sex marriages in California to resume after it ruled private parties did not have “standing” to defend a voter-approved ballot measure barring gay and lesbian couples from state-sanctioned wedlock.

More importantly, the court also rejected parts of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in its 5-4 Windsor decision, citing equal protection guarantees to conclude same-sex spouses legally married in a state may receive federal benefits such as tax breaks.

Measure of uncertainty

Citing that high court precedent, Shelby’s ruling was hailed by civil rights groups. But it also created a measure of uncertainty.

Because the judge — an appointee of President Barack Obama — did not immediately stay enforcement of his decision until the subsequent appeals process is exhausted– as other judges have done– it prompted same-sex couples to quickly obtain marriage licenses, despite the state’s ongoing legal challenge.

More than 1,300 such couples like Wood and Partridge were wed before the Supreme Court agreed to the state’s request for a stay.

“It is very unfortunate that so many Utah citizens have been put into this legal limbo,” said the state’s attorney general, Sean Reyes. His office later admitted it was a confusing situation, and announced that while it would provide marriage certificates to those who properly applied during the 17-day window between the ruling and the stay, it would not recognize them as valid, at least for the time being.

Utah may seem like an unusual battleground over homosexual rights, but the level of activism and growing public support is no surprise to many in that state.

A recent Williams Institute survey found among large cities, the Salt Lake City metropolitan area had the nation’s highest rate of same-sex couples raising children, at 26 percent. Memphis, Virginia Beach, Detroit, and San Antonio were not far behind. Among states, Mississippi led the list, also at 26 percent.

When it was passed in 2004, Utah’s Prop 3 had 66-percent voter support. But after Shelby’s ruling, a Salt Lake City Tribune poll found residents there equally divided 48 percent on whether same-sex couples should be allowed to get state-issued marriage licenses.

Controversial politically

Politically, the issue remains controversial, a reflection nationwide over how it will be resolved: whether the courts, state legislatures, or the voters should decide the future of same-sex marriage.

Wood and Partridge are among three Utah couples who brought the original lawsuit. The case could turn on defining the boundaries of marriage, within the context of family and children.

“This challenge is about real people with long-term loving relationships who believe they are entitled to respect and honor in this state, just like heterosexual couples,” said their Salt Lake City attorney, Peggy Tomsic, who will argue before the appeals court.

In their legal brief, the committed couples say Utah law “communicates to them and to all the world that their relationships are not as real, valuable, or worthy as those of opposite-sex couples; that they are worthy of no recognition at all; and that they are not, and never can be, true families.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights is also leading this legal challenge.

Will of the voters

But the state cites the will of the voters — and a wealth of social science — to argue “that moms and dads are different, not interchangeable, and that the diversity of having both a mom and a dad is the ideal parenting environment. … As between mutually exclusive models of marriage, the man-woman model is simply the one the state and its people believe is best for children.”

And officials argue in their brief that “By defining marriage as being between one man and one woman, Utah does not interfere with adults’ ability to commit to an exclusive, loving relationship with others of the same sex, or to bring children into that relationship.

“Instead, the laws at issue here simply encourage a familial structure that has served society for thousands of years as the ideal setting for raising children. Nothing in the federal Constitution prevents Utah’s citizens from making that choice.”

Seventeen states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage within its borders: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Just a decade ago, there were none.

The Utah case is Herbert v. Kitchen (13-4178). A ruling on that and Oklahoma’s same-sex marriage ban could come within weeks.

CNN contributed to this report.